Scars · Subcision · Comparison

Subcision vs Laser for Acne Scars

Working beneath a scar, or on it from above

Subcision divides the band pulling a scar down. Laser works on the surface. No laser can free a tether, so release usually comes first. Results vary.

Exam
Before Any Plan
Doctor
Examines You First
Written
Quote After Exam
Orchard
By Appointment

In Brief

Subcision vs laser depends on the scar. Subcision releases the band tethering a rolling scar, and laser works on the surface and upper dermis. Most faces carry both types, so tethered scars are released first, then resurfaced. Neither is the usual tool for ice-pick scars. Results vary. Our main page on this topic is Acne Scar Treatment Singapore.

At a Glance: Subcision vs Laser for Acne Scars

What it comparesSubcision, which works beneath a scar, and fractional laser, which works from above.
Order of treatmentTethered scars are released first, then resurfaced.
Who should waitActive acne, infection, keloid tendency, unreviewed isotretinoin use, bleeding tendency or pregnancy.
What it cannot doNo laser frees a tethered scar; neither is usual for ice-pick scars.
Main risksSubcision: bruising and swelling. Fractional CO2: redness, crusting and a recovery needing care.

What the Research Shows: Subcision vs Laser for Acne Scars

  • A 2025 systematic review of seven studies of fractional laser for acne scars reported most patients showing roughly 30% to 70% improvement, with transient redness, swelling and post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation the most common adverse events. [2]
  • A 2011 randomised trial of 30 patients reported scar severity improving by a mean 68.3% with needle-only collagen induction and 75.3% with 100% TCA CROSS, a non-significant difference (p=.47). [4]
  • A 2025 systematic review of 16 studies and 481 patients with acne scars concluded fractional radiofrequency microneedling is likely effective alone, and called for further randomised trials on treatment parameters. [5]
  • A 2026 uncontrolled study of 44 Vietnamese patients given three sessions of subcision with platelet-rich plasma reported mean Goodman and Baron grade falling from 3.3 to 2.1, with pain in 93%, swelling 41%, erythema 34%. [6]

Figures describe published study groups, which may have used other devices or protocols. They do not predict your result. Updated 6 November 2026.

About This Treatment

The short answer

These are not rivals. Subcision works beneath a scar, and fractional laser works on it from above. One asks whether something is pulling the scar down from inside. The other asks whether the surface can be smoothed.

A simple stretch test helps. A surface scar flattens when the skin is stretched, and a tethered scar stays pinned. Most faces carry more than one type, and a single device often reaches only some scars. Dr Sin Yong plans scar by scar.

Subcision vs laser, scar by scar

Scar typeWhat is usually used
Rolling, pinnedSubcision first, then resurfacing or RF microneedling
Boxcar, flattens on stretchResurfacing or RF microneedling, with no subcision needed
Boxcar, pinnedRelease, then resurfacing
Ice-pickTCA CROSS or point treatment
Flat red or brown marksTreated as redness or pigment, not scars
Raised, hypertrophic or keloidNot released or resurfaced. Injection or silicone, assessed separately

The tools named

Subcision

A fine needle or blunt cannula passes under the scar, without a surface incision, in the subcutaneous plane. It is a doctor-performed procedure under local anaesthetic.

Fractional CO2

The S3 Resurfacing Lift on the DEKA Tetra Pro makes multi-depth columns reaching the scar floor.

FSX Laser

FSX Laser is surface-directed, for superficial and textural scarring, with settings chosen for Fitzpatrick III to V.

RF microneedling

Secret DUO uses insulated needles for dermal remodelling, sparing the surface. It may be considered on darker skin, and suits rolling and shallow boxcar scars once any tether is gone.

TCA CROSS

For ice-pick scars and small, deep boxcar scars.

Filler support

Placed into a released space to hold the scar up while collagen forms. 4D Scar Reconstruction names Radiesse for this. Recovery varies.

The usual order

01
Release
Tethered scars are released first.
02
Support
Filler or a biostimulator where there is a volume deficit, and TCA CROSS for narrow tracts.
03
Resurface
Laser or RF microneedling follows, once the skin has settled.

Who should wait

Deferred

Active acne, since new lesions create new scars. Also infection, a keloid tendency, isotretinoin use not yet reviewed, a bleeding tendency, and pregnancy.

Examined first

Raised, changing or unusual scars.

Referred

Marked, widespread scarring beyond what release and resurfacing can address goes to a plastic surgery specialist.

What neither can do

No laser frees a tethered scar, and smoothing its surface leaves the pull in place. Neither subcision nor laser is the usual treatment for ice-pick scars. Resurfacing can worsen raised scars. Neither returns skin to an unmarked state. Scars are treated in stages, and the plan is adjusted as your skin responds.

Risks and recovery

Subcision

Bruising, swelling and tenderness that settle over days. Uncommonly, a small lump where blood collects, which is reviewed.

Fractional CO2

Redness, crusting and a recovery needing care. In Fitzpatrick III to V skin, the main risk is darkening. S3 has the highest pigment risk and longest recovery of the four named methods.

TCA CROSS

Crusting for about a week. Pigment change is possible, so test spots are used on darker skin.

RF microneedling

Redness and pinpoint marks for days.

Sessions and fees

No fixed course is promised at the start, and no session count is given. Steps are spaced so the skin settles between them. The fee depends on the number and type of scars, the steps planned and how they are staged. A written quote follows assessment, and no prices are listed.

Frequently Asked Questions

That depends on the scar. Tethered scars need release first. Scars that flatten on stretching may suit resurfacing or RF microneedling.
A tethered scar stays pinned when the skin is stretched, and a surface scar flattens. The doctor confirms this at examination.
Not if they are tethered. Surface work alone leaves the pull in place, so release is needed first.
Release comes first, then support if needed, then resurfacing.
It is not the usual tool. TCA CROSS or point treatment is used.
Scar work is deferred during active acne, as new lesions create new scars.
No surface incision is made. A fine needle or blunt cannula passes under the scar, under local anaesthetic, and the doctor performs it.
SY
Dr Sin Yong
MBBS (NUS) · MRCS (Edinburgh)
MSc Aesthetic Medicine (QMUL) · MSc Practical Dermatology (Cardiff)
Doctor registered with the Singapore Medical Council.

Have your scars mapped

Dr Sin Yong will examine you, explain your options and give any fee in writing.

WhatsApp the Clinic

References

  1. Vempati A, et al. Subcision for Atrophic Acne Scarring: A Comprehensive Review of Surgical Instruments and Combinatorial Treatments. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2023;16:125-134. View source · DOI · PMID 36698445
  2. Ptaszek B, et al. The Use of a Fractional Laser in Acne Scar Treatment-A Systematic Review. Life (Basel). 2025;15(6):915. View source · DOI · PMID 40566567
  3. Kang S, et al. New Atrophic Acne Scar Classification: Reliability of Assessments Based on Size, Shape, and Number. J Drugs Dermatol. 2016;15(6):693-702. View source · PMID 27272075
  4. Leheta T, et al. Percutaneous collagen induction versus full-concentration trichloroacetic acid in the treatment of atrophic acne scars. Dermatol Surg. 2011;37(2):207-216. View source · DOI · PMID 21269351
  5. Niaz G, et al. Fractional Radiofrequency Microneedling as a Monotherapy in Acne Scar Management: A Systematic Review of Current Evidence. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2025;18:19-29. View source · DOI · PMID 39781098
  6. Nguyen LV, Lam TT Treatment outcomes using subcision combined with platelet-rich plasma for atrophic acne scars: a study in Vietnamese patients. Skin Health Dis. 2026;6(4):477-484. View source · DOI · PMID 42539967

Studies may involve other devices or protocols, and they do not predict your own result. See our evidence library and editorial policy.

Related Treatments

Last updated 6 November 2026. General information only. Results vary between individuals. Images are illustrative and do not show patients.